A view of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) headquarters in New Delhi.
  | Photo Credit:
PTI

more-in

In view of Mr. Hershman’s “revelations”, the agency had earlier sought the permission of the trial court to conduct further investigation.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday said its probe in the Bofors case would continue in view of certain revelations made by one Michael Hershman.In view of Mr. Hershman’s “revelations”, the agency had earlier sought the permission of the trial court to conduct further investigation in the Bofors case.“The Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, had observed on May 8, 2019, that when independent right and power is available with the CBI to further investigate the matter on their own if in their wisdom it is necessary to do so then, why still such application is being filed in the court,” said the CBI.The court had fixed the next date of hearing on May 16.“After obtaining legal opinion, CBI filed an application on May 16 in the court of CMM, stating that for conducting further investigation under Section 173 (8) Cr.PC, permission of the court is not mandatorily required by the CBI and an intimation to the court in this regard will suffice,” the agency said.The CBI had, in February 2018, moved the Supreme Court appealing to revive charges against the Hinduja brothers in the ₹64-crore Bofors guns pay-off case.It submitted that Mr. Hershman, in an interview to an TV channel, stated that he was in possession of material which would show the payment of bribes in the Bofors deal, and that the involvement of powerful persons might be the reason for the checkered history of this case.It said the Delhi High Court had in 2005 quashed the proceedings in an arbitrary manner saying that the evidence collected from the authorities in Sweden were “neither available in original nor duly authenticated copies”.The agency had also blamed the UPA-I government for delay in making the appeal.In November 2018, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the CBI plea, saying it was not convinced by the CBI’s arguments.

Source